[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Abbreviated Tag Names
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:53:33 -0500
If you want to do this, you could consider asn.1 and perhaps an
xmlschema->asn.1->xml instance mapping. All the bit packing and so on has
been worked out by the asn.1 folks - you have to come up with the xml
Ruth Bergman wrote
> Hi all,
> I'm reviving a thread that ended some weeks ago (I'm afraid I'm about 1000
> messages behind on this list). I have been thinking about large data
> transfers myself recently. The problem we typically face at JPL is very
> large quantities of data and of course very limited telecommunication
> capability. Or I should say, we have excellent telecommunication
> capability, but it is still our limiting factor with the number and types
> of sensors our spacecraft carry.
> People in our organization are re-thinking some telecom data transmission
> formats, and XML came to mind. Unfortunately the overhead is very large.
> It is possible in many cases that overall tag size will be greater than
> data quantity.
> It would be useful to mimic, in XML, the way that telecom data is
> traditionally transmitted. Typically, in a transmission packet, there is a
> header that describes the data that follows. I think that an XML Schema
> could replace this header nicely. After transmission, it should be
> straightforward to unpack the data into a complete xml document using the
> schema in the header.
> Is anyone working on applications of this nature?