[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XPointer and the '729 patent
- From: Uche Ogbuji <email@example.com>
- To: "Eve L. Maler" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:12:42 -0700 (MST)
> After reviewing and considering the comments that have been submitted
> since the time of the posting, we offer to do the following:
> 1 Request a reexamination of the '729 Patent at our own expense.
> As part of the reexamination, we request that you provide us with
> any prior art of which you are aware so that Sun may submit any
> relevant prior art to the U.S. Patent Office.
> 2 Consider specific requests for changes to the terms.
> In order to accommodate the concerns of the development community,
> we are willing to consider alternative terms. We have already
> received some comments along these lines, and additional comments
> are welcome.
As one of those who initially criticized Sun and the W3C over this thing,
I'm quite struck by the open-mindedness of Sun's response.
I'm glad to know that even such a large company can avoid myopia with
regard to its self-interest.
I think amazon.com has a lesson to learn here.
Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
email@example.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python