[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: XML versus Relational Database
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Linda Grimaldi <grimlinda@earthlink.net>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 10:39:44 -0600
You may awaken the WhyGrovesAreNeeded
thread. :-)
Let me ask this: is the infoSet adequate
for defining the features all XML systems must
support, then what else is necessary to to
define an "XML database" so we can
figure out what the range of "decent" is?
Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Linda Grimaldi [mailto:grimlinda@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Benjamin Franz; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RE: XML versus Relational Database
Would anyone care to itemize the features they consider essential in a
"decent" XML database? I have my own, but I am hopelessly biased...