[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML versus Relational Database
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 12:51:55 -0500
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Let me ask this: is the infoSet adequate
> for defining the features all XML systems must
> support,
The features all XML systems (i.e. processors)
*must* support is very restrictive, and doesn't
at present even include GIs or element nesting.
*Should* support, well, who knows? That's why
the Infoset doesn't pretend to be normative;
it's a library of names of features thought to
be generally useful.
--
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein