[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query
- From: Brian Miller <brian_n_miller@yahoo.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:20:45 -0800 (PST)
"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> I've put the talk up online (fat: Powerpoint gifs
> inside HTML) at
>
http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/XML_MetaArchitecture.html
Thanks. That was nifty overview for a newby like
me.
I notice a seeming contradiction between slide 9 which
says:
"If a document isn’t well-formed, or is invalid, or
isn’t Namespace-conformant -- It doesn’t have an
Infoset"
and slide 13 which says:
"XSLT will properly be understood as mapping from one
Infoset to another".
If a stylesheet emits PostScript, then surely its
XSLT can't be thought of as a mapping between
infosets.
A hypothetical alternative to XSLT which only mapped
infosets would surely be safer and faster than XSLT.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/