[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail

From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 10:02:45 +1100

At 04:31 1/03/2001, Tim Bray wrote:

>At 12:07 PM 28/02/01 +1100, James Robertson wrote:
> >But when the difficult questions arise,
> >the W3C invariably says "hey don't blame
> >us, we're not creating standards!".
>
>Uh, when?  I haven't observed this. -T

Namespaces.

J


-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@steptwo.com.au

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>

References:
- RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
  - From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
- RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?
Next by Date: Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?
Previous by thread: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
Next by thread: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread