[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The relentless march of abstraction
- From: Dave Winer <email@example.com>
- To: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:19:18 -0800
What is "draconian error recovery" and why are you thanking it if it keeps
XML from being easy?
And what's a potted summary?
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cowan" <email@example.com>
To: "Dave Winer" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "XML-Dev (E-mail)" <email@example.com>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: The relentless march of abstraction
> Dave Winer scripsit:
> > Just the first few paragraphs opened my eyes to where the process is
> > with XML. I never understood what "infoset" was all about. Now that I
> Henry is a fine fellow who has done much good work. His view of the
> Infoset is not the only view, nor is this potted summary (IMHO) a fair
> representation of even Henry's view, much less the total view.
> (I speak as an editor of the Infoset, but not officially for the Core WG.)
> > There will be adoption where [XML is] as easy and forgiving as
> > HTML was in 1994.
> That will never happen, thanks to draconian error recovery. Hopefully
> XML will never become such a mess as HTML has become, either.
> > The relentless march to abstraction is good for keeping standards wonks
> > employed, but it doesn't do bupkis for interop and level playing fields
> > progress towards new Pleasure Buttons For The People. (Which is why HTML
> > such a breath of fresh air and so successful.)
> Without standards, there is no interoperability, much less a level
> playing field.
> John Cowan firstname.lastname@example.org
> One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
> --Douglas Hofstadter