[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: client side XML (was The relentless march of abstraction)
- From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:27:50 -0500 (EST)
We'd be a whole lot closer if Navigator had a decent implementation of XSLT.
People seem unwilling to commit to an IE-only approach, even if based on a
standard, er recommendation.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:41:49 -0800 Tim Bray wrote:
>At 11:41 AM 27/02/01 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>
> > I think that client-side XML failed simply because
> > it didn't fill a big enough real need (HTML 4 is
> > close enough)
>
>I have a problem with your verb tense. The web is
>still too slow. Fatter pipes aren't going to help. The
>only way to make it fast is to do some of the work on
>the (severely underemployed, these days) client, and the
>only way to do that is to send some useful data there to
>get chewed on. So I think client-side XML just
>hasn't got going yet. To say it had failed, it would be
>necessary for it to have been tried. -Tim