[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail

From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:09:24 +1100

At 04:37 28/02/2001, Frank Richards wrote:

>The corporations of the w3c come up with (hopefully) comprehensive, well
>defined, but 'make it work' oriented 'recommendations'.

And what do we (the punters) do if it "doesn't work"?

J

-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@steptwo.com.au

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
  - From: Frank Richards <frichards@softquad.com>

References:
- RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
  - From: Frank Richards <frichards@softquad.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
Next by Date: Re: client side XML (was The relentless march of abstraction)
Previous by thread: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
Next by thread: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread