[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Processing 'my' XML (was Re: Why Model Concepts?)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: Rick Jelliffe <firstname.lastname@example.org>, XML DEV <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:30:06 -0600
Nope. You simply shifted the burden to those who
define the architectures: the means to choose the means.
QED. (Groves, Illuminati, Bilderburgers)(Pick One)) rule.
Don't worry. We ARE in charge of all things meaningful.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sorry, that was bad even for me. XLink is an example of what I mean. By
using the XLink architecture, there will be less need for agreement between
humans (or computers) on the meaning of the specific labels, because they
already know about the architectural label. So the difficult task that Len
talks about of human agreement reduces to apply only to those people who
need to know the specifics: in many cases this may be no-one.