[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:39:45 -0500
Dave Winer scripsit:
> Just the first few paragraphs opened my eyes to where the process is going
> with XML. I never understood what "infoset" was all about. Now that I do,
Henry is a fine fellow who has done much good work. His view of the
Infoset is not the only view, nor is this potted summary (IMHO) a fair
representation of even Henry's view, much less the total view.
(I speak as an editor of the Infoset, but not officially for the Core WG.)
> There will be adoption where [XML is] as easy and forgiving as
> HTML was in 1994.
That will never happen, thanks to draconian error recovery. Hopefully
XML will never become such a mess as HTML has become, either.
> The relentless march to abstraction is good for keeping standards wonks
> employed, but it doesn't do bupkis for interop and level playing fields and
> progress towards new Pleasure Buttons For The People. (Which is why HTML was
> such a breath of fresh air and so successful.)
Without standards, there is no interoperability, much less a level
playing field.
--
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein