[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Rules & Grammars
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 10:41:00 -0600
I agree completely. I suggested a process be proposed,
not a schedule. What you suggest sounds like a good
start. I request, respectfully, the requirements.
Dang, Rick, you may have to chair a committee. :-)
Or better... treat it like SAX and RDDL, and
get a requirements statement from XML-Dev.
People like access.
Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:ricko@allette.com.au]
Perhaps all we need to standardize at the moment are (a couple of) useful
frameworks so that experimental and alternativc and niche and non-W3C
languages start life integrated into the general schema of things and not
orphaned.
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe