[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: XML versus Relational Database
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: "K. Ari Krupnikov" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 08:11:04 -0600
Both. The relational systems I see now in
commercial work all have object components.
The two or three that I consider the industry
leaders now have XML support. So, one doesn't
have to have either or. In terms of maturity,
the relational programmers have had a lot of
experience with automatic optimization for
large datasets. This topic pops up from
time to time and most of the answers
can be summarized as, no size fits all.
Intergraph Public Safety
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: K. Ari Krupnikov [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> From earlier discussions on this oft repeated
> thread topic, there is a lot of experience with the mature relational
> DB products, particularly in the area of index optimization. But
> you are quite right that most relational systems are now hybridized
> to the point that the XML vs Relational DB is a non-issue.
Are you referring to XML support in DB products or Object-Relational