[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more grist
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 20:06:22 +0100
Jonathan Borden wrote:
>
> As Henry Thompson recently told us in London, the important information that
> the post schema validation infoset adds to the post parse (or pre schema
> validation) infoset is types. Think of schema validation then as simply an
> XSLT which when applied to the infoset, adds types and tags indicating
> validity. It's really surprisingly simple.
I am sorry I have missed this and I wish XSLT could be used to do this
;=).
I have no problem with this picture as long as:
a) the mechanism that is used doesn't add constraints to the structures
I can define and allows me to describe the data types I need.
or
b) The system is kept open and I have alternative choices to do so.
In other words, I find it very difficult to admit that a specification
can restrict the scope of possibilities opened by XML.
Eric
--
See you in Austin (Knowledge Technologies 2001)
http://www.gca.org/attend/2001_conferences/kt_2001/mon.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea http://dyomedea.com
http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org http://ducotede.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------