Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1

[Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com>]

At 00:10 02/03/2001 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
>Hmm.  What do you think of...
>[snip very interesting xbind example]

I think it's great ! It's true that RDDL might not be powerful enough to
provide all that could be required for an extension, this really would help.

<xbind:param name="date" type="string" /> and <xbind:return type="string"
/> would need to accept more than just the XPath types in order to work
with extension objects (already in the spec). We need a simple way to
specify extra types.

Do you think something similar could be achieved for extension elements ?

-- robin b.
"Many people would sooner die than think. In fact, they do." - Bertrand
Russell