[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is that a fork in the road?
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 11:33:27 +0000
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Before we lament the complexity (We are whining!)
> or really sidetrack, we can stop and
> look at the path we came down (you did
> that in the speech) and then see if the
> next steps are obvious or not obvious.
> Can we safely say:
> 1. If it fails the parse, it isn't
> XML (draconian bases).
> 2. The base infoSet maps to the
> first level.
Yes (including Namespaces).
> 3. Each step afterwards is one
> one has to choose. XML Schema
> is an obvious step because it adds
> type information.
> What alternative steps for three are there
> other than the DTD? What alternative properties
> are added in these steps? Then we can
> get around to naming the steps.
Gentlefolk, start your engines.
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: email@example.com