[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
- From: Jonathan Borden <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Richard Tobin <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:01:02 -0500
Richard Tobin wrote:
> The PSV Infoset as it stands is probably rather too closely tied to
> XML Schemas for this to appeal to those defining other validators (or
> rather type-assigners). In particular the complex types and their
> representations are (of course) those of XML Schemas.
> Are the simple types sufficiently uncontroversial to form a basis for
> a common "typed infoset"?
1) an agreed upon XML serialization for the Infoset exists -- allowing
'infoset processing' to occur between perhaps disparate systems -- a
corollary is of course DOM representation of the PSVI information items.
2) Generally a standard mechanism or agreed upon convention for converting
between the type "xsd:foo" and a URI.