[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XMLSchema
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: XML DEV <email@example.com>, "Simon St.Laurent" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:04:43 -0500
Simon St.Laurent wrote -
To: "Thomas B. Passin" <email@example.com>; "XML DEV" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> At 09:17 PM 3/12/01 -0500, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
> >Simon St.Laurent:
> > > Even if the message arrives burdened with data schemata, content
> > > models and canonical semantics which the recipient has pledged to honor,
> > > end he must instantiate the 'true' data, or semantics, or meaning of the
> > > message as whatever it is that he is specifically capable of using,
> > > by processing it to some locally meaningful outcome.
> It doesn't affect the rest of the argument, but I think that's Walter Perry.
Whoops! Sorry, Walter, and thanks, Simon