[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: tolerating anarchy (was Re: Personal reply)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <email@example.com>,"David E. Cleary" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, XML DEV <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:53:15 -0600
The web succeeded based on a standard set of
generic codes passed among communicating parties
via a standard protocol all implemented over
a code library made freely available from
the originators of that code.
There isn't a hint of anarchy in that.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
How much anarchy can your systems tolerate?
I'd suggest that anarchy is a lot of why the Web succeeded and previous
approaches failed. Seems to be a matter of balancing structure and chaos,
not banishing disagreements.