[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
- From: Rick Jelliffe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: xml-dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:59:18 +0800
From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
>Note that the model, in this case, describes the application-level data
>is the ultimate goal; it is not a schema for the inbound XML. The input
>rules, in this implementation, also serve as a lightweight schema for the
>XML. I know this is different from what you had in mind, but I think I see
This is like the XForms approach too. Of course, there is all sorts of
layering and unlayering that we can do. In the XForms approach the "model"
really is the schema for the document transfer, so it is not a conceptual
model directly (unless the equivalent conceptual model actually would form a
tree, in which case it is a conceptual model :-).