[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Images embedded in XML
- From: Darshan Singh <darshan@PerfectXML.com>
- To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 16:02:49 -0500
I think, keeping binary data separate from XML text (if you can) would be a
better choice - one reason being binary to base64 encoding most of time may
increase the final data size.
From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 3:44 PM
To: darshan@PerfectXML.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; 'Seairth Jacobs'
Subject: RE: Images embedded in XML
Dumb question: In general, is it a good idea to
send any blob like this or would it be better
to keep it out of the XML and put it say elsewhere
in a MIME multipart message? What use is
there for putting unqueriable large datatypes
into a DOM?
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Darshan Singh [mailto:darshan@PerfectXML.com]
IMHO, CDATA section is not a good way to hold binary data (because then
you'll never be able to represent three byte sequence '5D 5D 3E' (hexr for
To save binary data as part of XML you'll have to use Base64 encoding. I
don't have Java code that illustrates that, but following article might be
useful just to get an idea:
XML and binary data