Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Any prior art?: An upcoming patent for an XSL implementation technique, Sean McGrath
  • Re: Any prior art?: An upcoming patent for an XSL implementationtechnique, Ken North
  • Re: Any prior art?: An upcoming patent for an XSL implementationtechnique, Aaron Swartz
  • RE: Any prior art?: An upcoming patent for an XSL implementationtechnique, Ramin Firoozye
• ANN: XSink Note Published, Aaron Swartz
  • Re: ANN: XSink Note Published, Justin Couch
    • Re: ANN: XSink Note Published, Aaron Swartz
  • Re: XSink Note Published, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: XSink Note Published, Danny Ayers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ANN: XSink Note Published, AndrewWatt2000
• adding up, Simon St.Laurent
• Announce: soap-newbies mail list, Dave Winer
• Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), Jeff Greif
    • Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models), W. E. Perry
• Trying to visualize XML standards, Michael Rohde
• Re: Any prior art?: An upcoming patent for an XSL implementationtechnique, Eric Bohlman
• ANN: XML Encoded XPath 0.2, Wayne Steele
• ANN: XML Encoded XPath 0.2 (DTD), Wayne Steele
• ANN: XML Encoded XPath 0.2 (Stylesheet), Wayne Steele
• ANN: XML Encoded XPath 0.2 (Samples), Wayne Steele
• Evidence that the W3 is a Shill, Wayne Steele
  • Re: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill, James Robertson
    • Re: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill, Dan Diebolt
      • RE: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill, Steve Rowe
      • RE: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill, Dan Mabbutt
      • RE: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill, Steve Rowe
      • Decimal internet addresses (was: Re: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill), Richard Tobin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill, Wayne Steele
• RE: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset, Richard Tobin
• Re: RDF Schema and XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes, Aaron Swartz
• Fwd: Thank you for talking about my work on the XML list, Sean McGrath
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
    • Message not available
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Amy Lewis
      • Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Murali Mani
      • Message not available
      • Re: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Ann Navarro
      • Re: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Murali Mani
• RE: multiple types, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Data mapping / loading (?), Jeff Rafter
    • Re: Data mapping / loading (?), Dan Diebolt
• multiple schema proposed recs, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: multiple schema proposed recs, Christopher R. Maden
    • Re: multiple schema proposed recs, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: multiple schema proposed recs, Mike.Champion
  • Re: multiple schema proposed recs, Rick Jelliffe
    • XML Schema Datatype: unanswered questions., Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
• Accommodation Deadline for XML Europe 2001 --- 5 April -- Hotels areselling out!, Elledge, Marion
• ANN: XMLCooktop 2.200, XML Everywhere
  • Re: ANN: XMLCooktop 2.200, david barnes
• novice question, Bogdan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: novice question, Wayne Steele
    • Re: novice question, Bob DuCharme
• another infoset vs. tree-model question, Richard Lanyon
  • Re: another infoset vs. tree-model question, Richard Tobin
  • Re: another infoset vs. tree-model question, Thomas B. Passin
• HTTP property set,XSet,PRL?, cks
  • Re: HTTP property set,XSet,PRL?, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: HTTP property set,XSet,PRL?, cks
• RE: XML Schema Datatype: unanswered questions., Arnold, Curt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML Schema Datatype: unanswered questions., Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: XML Schema Datatype: unanswered questions., Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: XML Schema Datatype: unanswered questions., Tim Bray
      • Re: XML Schema Datatype: unanswered questions., Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • RE: XML Schema Datatype: unanswered questions., David E. Cleary
      • RE: XML Schema Datatype: unanswered questions., David E. Cleary
      • XML Schema 1.1, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: XML Schema 1.1, Tim Bray
• Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP, Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• DSig & DOM & Databases, Tony Coates
  • RE: DSig & DOM & Databases, Paul Spencer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: DSig & DOM & Databases, Tony Coates
• Announce: Happy Birthday to XML-RPC, Dave Winer
  • Images embedded in XML, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: Images embedded in XML, Seairth Jacobs
      • Re: Images embedded in XML, John Cowan
      • Re: Images embedded in XML, hxzhang
      • Re: Images embedded in XML, John Cowan
      • RE: Images embedded in XML, Darshan Singh
      • RE: Images embedded in XML, Al Snell
      • RE: Images embedded in XML, Danny Ayers
      • RE: Images embedded in XML, Al B. Snell
      • RE: Images embedded in XML, Danny Ayers
      • RE: Images embedded in XML, Al B. Snell
      • RE: Images embedded in XML, Danny Ayers
      • RE: Images embedded in XML, Al B. Snell
      • "Binary XML" proposals, Tim Bray
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Ramin Firoozye
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Peter Jacobi
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Gerd Mueller
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Danny Ayers
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Gerd Mueller
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Christian Nentwich
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Sean McGrath
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Sean McGrath
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Christian Nentwich
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Oleg A. Paraschenko
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Christian Nentwich
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Danny Ayers
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Christian Nentwich
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Danny Ayers
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Danny Ayers
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Joe English
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Clark C. Evans
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Martin Gudgin
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Julian F. Reschke
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Robin Berjon
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Ken MacLeod
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Christopher R. Maden
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Dealing with namespaces (Was Re: "Binary XML" proposals), Joe English
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Tim Bray
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Murali Mani
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Anders W. Tell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Sean McGrath
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Sean McGrath
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P.
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Vassilis Papadimos
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Vassilis Papadimos
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Steinar Bang
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • HTTP vs. TCP (Re: "Binary XML" proposals), Stefan Zier
      • Re: HTTP vs. TCP (Re: "Binary XML" proposals), Benjamin Franz
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Steinar Bang
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Danny Ayers
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Danny Ayers
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Danny Ayers
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Danny Ayers
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Danny Ayers
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Clark C. Evans
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Olivier Dubuisson
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Clark C. Evans
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Timothy J. Luoma
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Brendan McKenna
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, David Brownell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, David Brownell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Amy Lewis
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Anders W. Tell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Olivier Dubuisson
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • Message not available
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Christopher R. Maden
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, W. E. Perry
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, W. E. Perry
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, W. E. Perry
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Danny Ayers
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Message not available
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Christopher R. Maden
      • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Stephen D. Williams
• RDDL for other languages ?, Eric van der Vlist
• XML Schema regex, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: XML Schema regex, Edd Dumbill
    • Re: XML Schema regex, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML Schema regex, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: XML Schema 1.1, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML Schema 1.1, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: XML Schema 1.1, Box, Don
    • Re: XML Schema 1.1, Henry S. Thompson
• XML data -> HTML, pguths
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML data -> HTML, Michael Brennan
• XSV up-to-date, major bug fix, upgrader, Henry S. Thompson
• XML Schema datatypes: NaN, lists of union types, [NEL],miscella neous editorial, Arnold, Curt
  • Re: XML Schema datatypes: NaN, lists of union types, [NEL],miscella neous editorial, Henry S. Thompson
• RE: Images embedded in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Images embedded in XML, Darshan Singh
    • RE: Images embedded in XML, Tim Bray
      • Re: Images embedded in XML, Mike Brown
  • RE: Images embedded in XML, Tim Bray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Images embedded in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Images embedded in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Images embedded in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Images embedded in XML, Benjamin Franz
  • RE: Images embedded in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Images embedded in XML, Andy Greener
  • RE: Images embedded in XML, Eric Bohlman
    • RE: Images embedded in XML, Al B. Snell
  • RE: Images embedded in XML, Wayne Steele
    • RE: Images embedded in XML, Al B. Snell
    • Re: Images embedded in XML, Olivier Dubuisson
  • Re: Images embedded in XML, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Images embedded in XML, Al Snell
  • RE: Images embedded in XML, Wayne Steele
    • RE: Images embedded in XML, Al B. Snell
    • Re: Images embedded in XML, Olivier Dubuisson
  • Re: Images embedded in XML, Wayne Steele
  • Images embedded in XML, Peter Jacobi
    • Re: Images embedded in XML, Al Snell
    • Re: Images embedded in XML, Claude Seyrat
  • Re: Images embedded in XML, Al Snell
• Must Input = Output, Winkowski, Daniel
• xml tables, Bogdan
  • Re: xml tables, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: xml tables, Christian Nentwich
• XML-Data Schema?, Ollikainen, Jari
• [ANN] alphaXML Haiku Competition Result, Paul Spencer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [ANN] alphaXML Haiku Competition Result, uche.ogbuji
• FW: XML Schema datatypes: NaN, lists of union types, [NEL],misce llaneous editorial, Arnold, Curt
  • Re: FW: XML Schema datatypes: NaN, lists of union types,[NEL],misce llaneous editorial, Eddie Robertsson
• XML DevCon 2001: Who's going?, B.K. DeLong
• RE: XML Schema datatypes: NaN, lists of union types, [NEL],miscella neous editorial, Biron,Paul V
• TalvaStudio Beta 1, Didier PH Martin
• Using XSLT to verify the existence of a URL, craig.patterson
  • Re: Using XSLT to verify the existence of a URL, David Carlisle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Using XSLT to verify the existence of a URL, Rick Jelliffe
• [ XSD ] xml instance with more than one namespace, Gavin Bong
  • Re: [ XSD ] xml instance with more than one namespace, Eddie Robertsson
• [ANN] XTooX - free XLink processor, Christian Nentwich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [ANN] XTooX - free XLink processor, AndrewWatt2000
• Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand,please, Michael Champion
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Eve L. Maler
    • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Christian Nentwich
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, John Cowan
• RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me und erstand, please, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me und erstand, please, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Iain W Fergusson
• Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, uche.ogbuji
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Eve L. Maler
    • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help meunderstand, please, Michel Biezunski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, uche.ogbuji
    • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Didier PH Martin
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, uche.ogbuji
    • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Eve L. Maler
  • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Michael Champion
    • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help meunderstand, please, Jonathan Borden
    • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help meunderstand, please, Michel Biezunski
    • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Joe English
      • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Didier PH Martin
      • Modularity (was: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please), Steven R. Newcomb
      • RE: Modularity (was: Linkbases,Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please), Chris Angus
      • Re: Modularity (was: Linkbases,Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please), John Cowan
      • Re: Modularity (was: Linkbases,Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please), Steven R. Newcomb
      • Re: Modularity (was: Linkbases,Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please), John Cowan
      • Re: Modularity (was: Linkbases,Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases --help me understand, please), Justin Couch
      • RE: Modularity (was: Linkbases,Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases --help me understand, please), Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Tim Bray
  • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Mike.Champion
    • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please, Steven R. Newcomb
• Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, uche.ogbuji
  • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Didier PH Martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, uche.ogbuji
    • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, John Cowan
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, uche.ogbuji
    • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Uche Ogbuji
    • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Didier PH Martin
    • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Uche Ogbuji
    • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Didier PH Martin
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Murali Mani
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Murali Mani
  • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Murali Mani
      • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Al Snell
      • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Danny Ayers
      • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Al B. Snell
      • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps, and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me, Thomas B. Passin
• test - ignore, Patrice Bonhomme
• xml from ms-sql ... how can I display data with *.asp???, Pepe Ortiz
  • RE: xml from ms-sql ... how can I display data with *.asp???, Danny Ayers
    • Re: xml from ms-sql ... how can I display data with *.asp???, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: xml from ms-sql ... how can I display data with *.asp???, Jim Ancona
    • transforming xml from db, Pepe Ortiz
• ANN: AutoHelp 1.1 released, Danny Ayers
• RDF and URIs (was Re: Modularity, et al.), Wayne Steele
  • Re: RDF and URIs (was Re: Modularity, et al.), Aaron Swartz
• Uncomplicating IT: Simpler Said Than Done, Michael Champion
  • Re: Uncomplicating IT: Simpler Said Than Done, Clark C. Evans
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Uncomplicating IT: Simpler Said Than Done, Eric Bohlman
  • RE: Uncomplicating IT: Simpler Said Than Done, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Request for Comments: XML binary encoding, Al B. Snell
  • RE: Request for Comments: XML binary encoding, Danny Ayers
    • RE: Request for Comments: XML binary encoding, Al B. Snell
  • Message not available
    • Re: Request for Comments: XML binary encoding, Paul Cody Johnston
      • Re: Request for Comments: XML binary encoding, Al B. Snell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Request for Comments: XML binary encoding, Al B. Snell
• RE: transforming xml from db, Michael Rys
• XML Schema min/max/Inclusice/Exclusive facet question, KAZUMI Saito
  • Re: XML Schema min/max/Inclusice/Exclusive facet question, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schema min/max/Inclusice/Exclusive facet question, Biron,Paul V
    • Re: XML Schema min/max/Inclusice/Exclusive facet question, KAZUMI Saito
• RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Claude Seyrat
    • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
    • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Anders W. Tell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Miles Sabin
    • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, David Brownell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Murali Mani
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, David Brownell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Sean McGrath
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Anders W. Tell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Miles Sabin
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
      • RFC DTD (was "Binary XML" proposals), Christian Nentwich
      • Re: RFC DTD (was "Binary XML" proposals), Al B. Snell
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Gavin Thomas Nicol
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Anders W. Tell
      • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Murali Mani
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Miles Sabin
    • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, David Brownell
  • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bill dehOra
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Miles Sabin
    • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, David Brownell
  • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
  • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Conversion of characters, Raj
      • Re: Conversion of characters, Mike Brown
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Peter Jacobi
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Vegt, Jan
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al B. Snell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Miles Sabin
    • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Al Snell
    • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, David Brownell
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Vegt, Jan
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: "Binary XML" proposals, Rick Jelliffe
• More binary XML, Stefan Zier
  • Re: More binary XML, Al Snell
    • Re: More binary XML, Anders W. Tell
      • Re: More binary XML, Al B. Snell
• preceding/following sibling, Mattio Valentino
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: preceding/following sibling, craig.patterson
  • FW: preceding/following sibling, craig.patterson
• preceding/following sibling -- XSL snippet, Mattio Valentino
• Another binary XML approach, Stefan Zier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Another binary XML approach, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Another binary XML approach, Stefan Zier
      • Re: Another binary XML approach, Olivier Dubuisson
      • Re: Another binary XML approach, Tim Bray
  • RE: Another binary XML approach, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Another binary XML approach, Sean McGrath
      • Re: Another binary XML approach, Stephen D. Williams
  • RE: Another binary XML approach, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [Xml-bin] RE: Another binary XML approach, Al Snell
• ANN : RDF Process Profile (RPP), Danny Ayers
• XLink draft support for xml 1.0, kanagavisu
  • Re: XLink draft support for xml 1.0, Thomas B. Passin
• XML Parsers for UNIX environments, Cameron Beeler
  • Message not available
    • Re: XML Parsers for UNIX environments, Sam TH
  • Re: XML Parsers for UNIX environments, Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML Parsers for UNIX environments, Richard Tobin
• Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Al B. Snell
  • Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Claude Seyrat
    • Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Al B. Snell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Al Snell
    • Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, James Robertson
      • Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Stephen D. Williams
      • Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Al Snell
      • RE: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Danny Ayers
      • RE: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Al Snell
      • Message not available
      • Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Amy Lewis
      • Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Al Snell
      • Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date, Al Snell
• Australian XML Interest Group Meeting, Steve Ball
• Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Francis Norton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Al Snell
    • Re: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Dave Winer
    • Message not available
      • Re: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Edd Dumbill
  • RE: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Al B. Snell
  • RE: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Mike.Champion
  • RE: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Inline DTD in stylesheet, Kevin Burges
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Inline DTD in stylesheet, Wayne Steele
• New Technology Area announced for XML Europe 2001, Elledge, Marion
• Web microwaves and WSDL (was RE: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American), Mike.Champion
• ANNOUNCE: dom4j 0.2 released, James Strachan
  • validating schema parser, Lindsey McNerney
    • Re: validating schema parser, Matt Sergeant
• Tim Bray on XML hits and misses, Mike.Champion
  • Message not available
    • Re: Tim Bray on XML hits and misses, Edd Dumbill
• Check developerWorks for XML DevCon 2001 reports and audio programs, Ken North
• Check developerWorks for XML DevCon 2001 session reports and audio, Ken North
  • Message not available
    • Don't forget me (was Re: Check developerWorks for XML DevCon 2001session reports and audio), Edd Dumbill
• RE: [Xml-bin] RE: Another binary XML approach, Derek Denny-Brown
  • RE: [Xml-bin] RE: Another binary XML approach, Al Snell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Xml-bin] RE: Another binary XML approach, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• AnthML, James_Landrum
• Apples with apples (was Re: "Binary XML" proposals), Rick Jelliffe
• PSVI in XML, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: PSVI in XML, Martin Gudgin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PSVI in XML, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: PSVI in XML, Simon St.Laurent
    • Sorting an XML file., S. Jyotinarayan
• Re: Don't forget me (was Re: Check developerWorks for XML DevCon2001session reports and audio), Ken North
• Comments, Al B. Snell
  • RE: Comments, Ramin Firoozye
    • RE: Comments, Al B. Snell
  • Re: Comments, Bob DuCharme
    • RE: Comments, Danny Ayers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Comments, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: validating schema parser, Wayne Steele
• XML spec dependencies chart --, Ian Graham
  • Re: XML spec dependencies chart --, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: XML spec dependencies chart --, Ian Graham
      • Re: XML spec dependencies chart --, Jeff Rafter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML spec dependencies chart --, Rick Jelliffe
• OASIS TC call for participation: XACML, Karl Best
• XML won't validate against schema, Tim Greiner
  • RE: XML won't validate against schema, Danny Ayers
    • XML won't validate against schema, Tim Greiner
      • Re: XML won't validate against schema, Henry S. Thompson
      • RE: XML won't validate against schema, Giota Karadimitriou
      • Re: XML won't validate against schema, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: XML won't validate against schema, Martin Gudgin
      • Re: XML won't validate against schema, Eddie Robertsson
      • RE: XML won't validate against schema, Danny Ayers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML won't validate against schema, Paul Hermans
• Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001, Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001, Mike.Champion
    • Re: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001, Dave Winer
    • RE: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001, XML Everywhere
      • Re: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001, Dave Winer
      • Re: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001, Matt Sergeant
      • Message not available
      • So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-Post: TheState of XML-RPC, April 2001), Edd Dumbill
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-Post:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-Post:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Didier PH Martin
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-Post:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Dave Winer
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-Post:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Matt Sergeant
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: MassiveCross-Post:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-Post:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Ken MacLeod
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-Post:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Matt Sergeant
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-Post:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Dave Winer
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you?, David Brownell
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you?, Ken MacLeod
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you?, David Brownell
• RELAX, Cross-Browser XML, Simon St.Laurent
  • XML in Healthcare, Intro to RDF, Jonathan Borden
    • Corrected URL was: Re: XML in Healthcare, Intro to RDF, Jonathan Borden
• supporting non-xml and xml capable browser, Jong Tjioe
  • Re: supporting non-xml and xml capable browser, Matt Sergeant
• a or b or both - mystery.., Anshul.Mittal
  • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Marcus Carr
    • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Murali Mani
      • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Marcus Carr
      • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Murali Mani
      • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Marcus Carr
      • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Murali Mani
      • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Marcus Carr
      • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Murali Mani
      • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Murali Mani
      • Message not available
      • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Joe English
      • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Marcus Carr
      • Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery..), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery..), Murali Mani
      • Re: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery..), Murali Mani
      • deterministic content model, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
      • Re: deterministic content model, Murali Mani
      • Re: deterministic content model, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
      • Re: deterministic content model, Murali Mani
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a or b or both - mystery.., Richard Tobin
• OT: Senior Consultant(s) Available, mgl
• Topic Maps, Knowledge Management,and Vertical Industry Case Stud y Sessions highlight XML Europe 2001, Elledge, Marion
• Comparing XML document objects in java, Ami
• atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: atoms, molecules, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
    • Re: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
    • Message not available
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: atoms, molecules, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: atoms, molecules, Stuart Naylor
    • RE: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: atoms, molecules, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: atoms, molecules, Steve Rosenberry
    • Re: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Steve Rosenberry
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Al Snell
    • RE: atoms, molecules, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: atoms, molecules, Al Snell
  • Re: atoms, molecules, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: atoms, molecules, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: atoms, molecules, Rzepa, Henry
    • Re: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Al Snell
  • Re: atoms, molecules, Anders W. Tell
    • Re: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Anders W. Tell
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Anders W. Tell
      • Re: atoms, molecules, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: atoms, molecules, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: atoms, molecules, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: atoms, molecules, Wayne Steele
• W3C press release: comments on standard-setting, Ken North
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: W3C press release: comments on standard-setting, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: W3C press release: comments on standard-setting, Mike.Champion
    • RE: W3C press release: comments on standard-setting, Ann Navarro
      • RE: W3C press release: comments on standard-setting, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: W3C press release: comments on standard-setting, Ann Navarro
      • Re: W3C press release: comments on standard-setting, David Brownell
      • Message not available
      • Re: W3C press release: comments on standard-setting, David Brownell
• RE: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-P ost:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Apparent contradiction in use of PEs inside internal entity defs, John-Paul Sicotte
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Apparent contradiction in use of PEs inside internal entity defs, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Apparent contradiction in use of PEs inside internal entity defs, John-Paul Sicotte
      • Re: Apparent contradiction in use of PEs inside internal entity defs, Richard Tobin
• Using W3C Regular Expressions, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Michael Brennan
    • Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Anders W. Tell
      • Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Al Snell
      • RE: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Leigh Dodds
      • Message not available
      • Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Al B. Snell
      • Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Henry S. Thompson
      • SVG paths in XSLT (was: Using W3C Regular Expressions), Robin Berjon
      • Re: SVG paths in XSLT (was: Using W3C Regular Expressions), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: SVG paths in XSLT (was: Using W3C Regular Expressions), Robin Berjon
      • RE: SVG paths in XSLT (was: Using W3C Regular Expressions), Leigh Dodds
      • Re: SVG paths in XSLT (was: Using W3C Regular Expressions), Al Snell
      • Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Al Snell
      • Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Robin Berjon
  • RE: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Using W3C Regular Expressions, Al B. Snell
      • performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions), James Strachan
      • Re: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions), Al B. Snell
      • RE: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions), Danny Ayers
      • Message not available
      • Re: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions), Sam TH
      • Re: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions), Anders W. Tell
• Re: Sorting an XML file., Darshan Singh
• No Subject, mariappan sundararajan
• Announce: ElCel Technology release XML Validator 0.9, Rob Lugt
• XML Help, Saxena, Saurabh
  • Re: XML Help, Francis Norton
• XML Parser for VAX VMS, Christopher Brand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Parser for VAX VMS, Dylan Walsh
• open sourced xml diff tools or package ?, Jin Zhao
  • Re: open sourced xml diff tools or package ?, Robin LaFontaine
  • Re: open sourced xml diff tools or package ?, Eduardo Gutentag
• XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Stephen D. Williams
  • Re: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Al Snell
  • Re: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Joel Bender
    • Re: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Stephen D. Williams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Joel Bender
  • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Joel Bender
      • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Danny Ayers
  • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, James Robertson
  • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Joel Bender
      • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Robin LaFontaine
  • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Joel Bender
  • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML Overlays and Deltas: Existing methods? Ideas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML Diff and Sync, Joel Bender
  • Re: XML Diff and Sync, Robin LaFontaine
    • Re: XML Diff and Sync, Joel Bender
      • Re: XML Diff and Sync, Robin LaFontaine
• RE: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery ..), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery ..), Murali Mani
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery ..), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• transfer namespace within XSL, Ivo Ottiger
  • RE: transfer namespace within XSL, Steve Rowe
  • Re: transfer namespace within XSL, Rob Lugt
• Simple API for accessing data in an XML file in Java ? without ha vingto write all the parsing code myself, Arthur Senator
  • Message not available
    • Re: Simple API for accessing data in an XML file in Java ? without having to write all the parsing code myself, Edd Dumbill
  • Re: Simple API for accessing data in an XML file in Java ? without having to write all the parsing code myself, Thomas Nichols
• XLink !!! Grammer not available, why ???, kanagavisu
  • Message not available
    • Re: XLink !!! Grammer not available, why ???, Henry S. Thompson
• Is there a java implementation for RAX ?, Arthur Senator
• [ANN] Ipedo XML Database Beta available for trial, Samantha Cichon
• XML in E-learning space, Mallaparaju J.G.A
  • Re: XML in E-learning space, Dan Diebolt
• Strategies in XML storage and display interaction, Jonathan Asbell
  • RE: Strategies in XML storage and display interaction, Leigh Dodds
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Strategies in XML storage and display interaction, Mike.Champion
• Capturing Value from XML Schema, Saxena, Saurabh
• Create XML with DTD in Java, Bing.Li
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Create XML with DTD in Java, Li Bing
• SAX Filters, Leigh Dodds
  • Re: SAX Filters, David Brownell
    • RE: SAX Filters, Leigh Dodds
      • Re: SAX Filters, David Brownell
      • RE: SAX Filters, Leigh Dodds
      • Re: SAX Filters, David Brownell
      • RE: SAX Filters, Leigh Dodds
      • Re: SAX Filters, David Brownell
  • XChart, was: RE: SAX Filters, Jonathan Borden
• Transitive closure for XPath, Christian Nentwich
  • Re: Transitive closure for XPath, Joe English
    • Re: Transitive closure for XPath, Christian Nentwich
    • Re: Transitive closure for XPath, Joe English
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Transitive closure for XPath, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: Transitive closure for XPath, Uche Ogbuji
• RE: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-P ost:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you? (was Re: Massive Cross-P ost:The State of XML-RPC, April 2001), Ken MacLeod
    • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you?, David Brownell
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you?, Ken MacLeod
      • RE: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you?, Stuart Naylor
      • Re: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you?, Ken MacLeod
• [ANN] Charity XML Bookshop launched, Paul Spencer
• Re: [Xml-bin] :-(, Stephen D. Williams
  • Re: [Xml-bin] :-(, Matt Sergeant
    • Re: [Xml-bin] :-(, Al Snell
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Xml-bin] :-(, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: [Xml-bin] :-(, Al Snell
    • RE: [Xml-bin] :-(, Leigh Dodds
  • RE: [Xml-bin] :-(, Leigh Dodds
• how creating a DOM with help of XPATH????, mario.heiss
  • Re: how creating a DOM with help of XPATH????, Christian Nentwich
• Call for Chapter Proposals, Patrick van Bommel
• RE: SVG paths in XSLT (was: Using W3C Regular Expressions), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressio ns), Arnold, Curt
  • Re: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressio ns), James Strachan
• XML Schema Question, charlescook
  • Message not available
    • Re: XML Schema Question, Henry S. Thompson
• Call for Speakers Software Development Boston 2001, Elliotte Rusty Harold
• RE: So what do SOAP and XML-RPC buy you?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• xsi:schemaLocation in target XML Doc using XSLT, Ivo Ottiger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: xsi:schemaLocation in target XML Doc using XSLT, Wayne Steele
• * instead of /, Darshan Singh
  • Re: * instead of /, Jeff Rafter
• ASP vs. Javascript, =?UNKNOWN?B?MMMMMMMM?=
• Blanket Statements about WAP, Arved Sandstrom
  • Re: Blanket Statements about WAP, Sean McGrath
  • Re: Blanket Statements about WAP, John Evdemon
• Sample for C++ schema validation using MSXML 4, Marcinkovics Tamas
  • sample JScript validation using MSXML 4 (was: Re: Sample for C++schema validation using MSXML 4), Francis Norton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sample for C++ schema validation using MSXML 4, Marcinkovics Tamas
• Announce: ElCel Technology release Canonical XML Processor 0.9, Rob Lugt
• XEmacs and the web.xml DTD, Crandall, William
  • Re: XEmacs and the web.xml DTD, Lars Marius Garshol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XEmacs and the web.xml DTD, olivier.dameron
  • Re: XEmacs and the web.xml DTD, Crandall, William
    • Message not available
      • Re: XEmacs and the web.xml DTD, Sankaranarayanan K V
• TREX and RELAX unite?, Michael Champion
  • Re: TREX and RELAX unite?, James Clark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: TREX and RELAX unite?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: TREX and RELAX unite?, Murali Mani
• Special pounding in XSLT, G.Taylor
  • Re: Special pounding in XSLT, David Carlisle
• ZDNet Schema article, and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Michael Champion
  • Re: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Murali Mani
  • Re: ZDNet Schema article, and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Ann Navarro
    • Re: ZDNet Schema article, and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Murali Mani
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ZDNet Schema article, and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, mrossi
    • Re: ZDNet Schema article, and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Dan Brickley
  • RE: ZDNet Schema article, and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Michael Champion
• iFive Call for Speakers (San Jose, October 29-November 1), Ken North
• RE: ZDNet Schema article, and hiding complexity within user-frien dlyproducts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: ZDNet Schema article, and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Tony Presti
• XML for software development and internal/external technicalspecifications, Patrice Bonhomme
• The Roadkilll of Ximplifications (Was RE: ZDNet Schema article,a nd hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: The Roadkilll of Ximplifications (Was RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts), Tony Presti
• RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Michael Champion
  • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Murali Mani
    • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Al Snell
      • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Dan Brickley
      • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Al B. Snell
      • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Dan Brickley
      • Re: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Aaron Swartz
    • Re: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity withinuser-friendlyproducts, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity withinuser-friendlyproducts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity withinuser-friendlyproducts, Francis Norton
    • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity withinuser-friendlyproducts, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Eric Bohlman
  • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendlyproducts, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Murali Mani
  • RE: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Murali Mani
    • RE: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Eric van der Vlist
    • RE: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Murali Mani
  • RE: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [ANN]: B-Bop Announces New Release of Xfinity (tm) XML Server, Soumitra Sengupta
• Yet Another We Need Schema Discipline Article, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Yet Another We Need Schema Discipline Article, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Yet Another We Need Schema Discipline Article, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Validation API, was: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Tony Coates
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Validation API, was: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Wayne Steele
    • RE: Validation API, was: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., Leigh Dodds
    • Re: Validation API, was: Regarding the vote on XML Schema., David Brownell
• 4 weeks till XML Europe - check out the Late Breaking presentatio ns,the Graphic sessions, and more., Elledge, Marion
• Ann: Hands-on XSLT/XPath (June 18-20) and XSLFO (June 21-22) training(XML-DEV), G. Ken Holman
• Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Eve L. Maler
  • Seeking lURNed advice on UDDI, Tim Bray
    • Re: Seeking lURNed advice on UDDI, Eric Chiu
    • RE: Seeking lURNed advice on UDDI, Stuart Naylor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, AndrewWatt2000
    • Re: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Christian Nentwich
      • RE: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Ron Daniel
      • Re: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Christian Nentwich
      • RE: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Ron Daniel
      • Re: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Eve L. Maler
      • Re: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Paul Grosso
  • Re: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, AndrewWatt2000
    • Re: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Steve Tinney
  • RE: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Steven J. DeRose
  • RE: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Sun IPR statement on XPointer, AndrewWatt2000
• XMTP: new version and SAX implementation, Jonathan Borden
• What if:, Al B. Snell
  • Re: What if:, Sean B. Palmer
  • Re: What if:, Aaron Swartz
    • Re: What if:, Charles Reitzel
      • Re: What if:, Aaron Swartz
      • Re: What if:, Charles Reitzel
    • Re: What if:, James Robertson
      • Re: What if:, Sean B. Palmer
      • Re: What if:, Charles Reitzel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What if:, Al B. Snell
• Now playing: "Web Services: The End of Packaged Software?", Ken North
• Redfoot 0.9.6 released, James Tauber
• AW: XEmacs and the web.xml DTD -- solution., Crandall, William
• XML Schema datatype spec : version linking problem, Simon Fell
  • Re: XML Schema datatype spec : version linking problem, Henry S. Thompson
• XML Spaghetti (Was Re: XML spec dependencies chart --), AndrewWatt2000
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Spaghetti (Was Re: XML spec dependencies chart --), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Question using special characters and XSLT, G.Taylor
  • Re: Question using special characters and XSLT, David Carlisle
• Is EDI replaced by XML? a point of view, Eric Chiu
  • RE: Is EDI replaced by XML? a point of view, Michael Fitzgerald
  • RE: Is EDI replaced by XML? a point of view, Stuart Naylor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Is EDI replaced by XML? a point of view, Michael Brennan
  • RE: Is EDI replaced by XML? a point of view, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• ebXML adapt SOAP, is UDDI next?, Eric Chiu
  • Re: ebXML adapt SOAP, is UDDI next?, Simon Fell
• xml-arch?, Eric Chiu
• Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNet Schema article,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Murali Mani
  • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNet Schemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNet Schemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNetSchemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNetSchemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNet Schemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
      • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNet Schemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Murali Mani
      • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNetSchemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Eric van der Vlist
• steel products DTDs / schemas, Ewan McEachran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: steel products DTDs / schemas, Michael_Dockham
• Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNet Schemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNet Schemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Murali Mani
    • Re: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems (WAS RE: ZDNet Schemaarticle,and hiding complexity within user-friendly products), Al Snell
• error when parsing an xml-schema with Jaxp and DOM, I.Eck
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: error when parsing an xml-schema with Jaxp and DOM, Michael Brennan
    • Re: error when parsing an xml-schema with Jaxp and DOM, I.Eck
      • Re: error when parsing an xml-schema with Jaxp and DOM, Eddie Robertsson
• Electric Power Industry DTDs/Schema, Saraswathi
• XML transformation using XSL - Please help - Thanks, Thushara Perera
  • CreateNewInstance" from xml(Schema), sabba
    • Re: CreateNewInstance" from xml(Schema), Jurgen
• Re: Seeking lURNed advice on UDDI, Iain W Fergusson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Seeking lURNed advice on UDDI, Iain W Fergusson
  • RE: Seeking lURNed advice on UDDI, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Seeking lURNed advice on UDDI, Tony Coates
• XML Schema editor, Vicky Papaioannou
• RE: CreateNewInstance" from xml(Schema), Michael Rys
  • Re: CreateNewInstance" from xml(Schema), sabba
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: CreateNewInstance" from xml(Schema), Michael Rys
    • Re: CreateNewInstance" from xml(Schema), sabba
• XSL Line Breaks/Indentation - Please !!!, Thushara Perera
  • Re: XSL Line Breaks/Indentation - Please !!!, David Carlisle
• XML to XML Transformation using XSL and XALAN, Thushara Perera
  • Re: XML to XML Transformation using XSL and XALAN, Jeff Rafter
• ANN: XSLTunit, Eric van der Vlist
• RE: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Can XML Schemas Support Document Systems, Murali Mani
    • One request regarding schema issues.., Murali Mani
  • Query!!!!, Vishal
• SAOL and SASL Schema, Brian Grainger
  • Re: SAOL and SASL Schema, Al Snell
• Netscape and RSS, Dave Winer
  • Re: Netscape and RSS, Matt Sergeant
    • Re: Netscape and RSS, John Cowan
  • Re: Netscape and RSS, Joe English
    • Re: Netscape and RSS, David Brownell
• Soapbox: Magic bullet or dud? & Models for dynamic e-business, Kelli Wiginton
• books on XML, Difu Su
  • Re: books on XML, Ken North
  • Re: books on XML, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: books on XML, Paul Spencer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: books on XML, Thushara Perera
• [ANNOUNCE]: XML Query Engine with early XQuery support, Howard Katz
• Observations of B2B XML Technologies (ebXML, UDDI), Ken North
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Observations of B2B XML Technologies (ebXML, UDDI), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML transformation using XSL - Urgent, Please HELP!! Thanks, Thushara Perera
  • Re: XML transformation using XSL - Urgent, Please HELP!! Thanks, Francis Norton
  • Re: XML transformation using XSL - Urgent, Please HELP!! Thanks, Jeff Rafter
• XML/XSL transformation using XALAN/JAVA, Thushara Perera
• XML on Mac with IE4.5, S. Jyotinarayan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML on Mac with IE4.5, S. Jyotinarayan
• [ANN] FastXML, Helena Kupková
• XML Digests using Xerces and XML Security Suite, Iwan Eising
  • RE: XML Digests using Xerces and XML Security Suite, Iwan Eising
• XML/XML Transformation - Please Help !!!....., Thushara Perera
  • Re: XML/XML Transformation - Please Help !!!....., Wei-Chin Hsieh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML/XML Transformation - Please Help !!!....., Thushara Perera
  • Re: XML/XML Transformation - Please Help !!!....., G. Ken Holman
    • Re: XML/XML Transformation - Please Help !!!....., Rob Lugt
      • Re: XML/XML Transformation - Please Help !!!....., G. Ken Holman
  • RE: XML/XML Transformation - Please Help !!!....., Thushara Perera
    • RE: XML/XML Transformation - Please Help !!!....., G. Ken Holman
  • RE: XML/XML Transformation - Please Help !!!....., Thushara Perera
  • RE: XML/XML Transformation - Please Help !!!....., Thushara Perera
• XSL - Break out from a for-each loop - Please help!!, Thushara Perera
• msxml on macintosh, S. Jyotinarayan
• XSL - Variable Assignment, Thushara Perera
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XSL - Variable Assignment, Bart Stevens
• Tools for XML data binding for C++, Thomas.Rothfuss
• XML namespaces and XSLT, Kris Vloeberghs
  • Re: XML namespaces and XSLT, G. Ken Holman
• Wasting half a trillion dollars?, W. E. Perry
  • Re: Wasting half a trillion dollars?, David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Wasting half a trillion dollars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Wasting half a trillion dollars?, Al Snell
• Is this possible in xml, shravan kumar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Is this possible in xml, Paul Roe
• Parser torture documents, Chris Nokleberg
  • Re: Parser torture documents, David Brownell
  • Re: Parser torture documents, Marcus Carr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Parser torture documents, Wayne Steele