[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001
- From: XML Everywhere <host@xmleverywhere.com>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>,Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com, dave@userland.com, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:57:29 -0700
If you have XML messaging over http, why do you need
anything else? Here is the XML I expect, here's the
XML I'm going to return, and here is the
URL. I love how software engineers like to make
tools instead of solve real problems. Are we expected
to suspend disbelief and think these tools are bug-free
and have no overhead?
You're going to save me time and make the world
inter-operate. Yeah right. I didn't believe it when the
CORBA and COM people said it and I don't
believe it from the XML people either.
The world will always be chaos, get used to it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
To: <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>; <dave@userland.com>;
<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 11:23 AM
Subject: RE: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001
At 01:56 PM 4/16/01 -0400, Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com wrote:
>Could
>someone explain WHY the real world needs XML-RPC in addition to SOAP?
Personally, I'll take XML-RPC for the tasks it performs. If I want
something more sophisticated, I'll go straight to XML messaging over HTTP,
and steer clear of SOAP entirely.