[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001
- From: Dave Winer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:14:41 -0700
Check this out.
----- Original Message -----
From: "XML Everywhere" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Simon St.Laurent" <email@example.com>;
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001
> If you have XML messaging over http, why do you need
> anything else? Here is the XML I expect, here's the
> XML I'm going to return, and here is the
> URL. I love how software engineers like to make
> tools instead of solve real problems. Are we expected
> to suspend disbelief and think these tools are bug-free
> and have no overhead?
> You're going to save me time and make the world
> inter-operate. Yeah right. I didn't believe it when the
> CORBA and COM people said it and I don't
> believe it from the XML people either.
> The world will always be chaos, get used to it.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon St.Laurent" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>; <email@example.com>;
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 11:23 AM
> Subject: RE: Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001
> At 01:56 PM 4/16/01 -0400, Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com wrote:
> >someone explain WHY the real world needs XML-RPC in addition to SOAP?
> Personally, I'll take XML-RPC for the tasks it performs. If I want
> something more sophisticated, I'll go straight to XML messaging over HTTP,
> and steer clear of SOAP entirely.