[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: atoms, molecules
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 11:16:14 +0100
"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> writes:
> At 08:25 PM 4/17/01 -0400, Steve Rosenberry wrote:
> >Noah's main justification against the proposal came down to this:
> >
> >===
> >
> >"The XML Recommendation itself is very clear that [1]: "Terseness in XML
> >markup is of minimal importance." While individual cases require
> >judgment, it seems a mistake in general to try and use schemas to undo
> >this stylistic decision. ...
> >
> >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-origin-goals"
>
> Uh, okay, so why not require everyone to use markup like:
> <date><year>1970</year><month>11</month><day>25</day></date>
We should have, in my opinion.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/