[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Tim BL Semantic Web article in Scientific American
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Al Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:44:41 -0500
No fear. Just an understanding that
nothing that starts simple stays simple
and marketing hype often hides a lack of
knowledge, an unwillingness to know
or even agendas too off-putting to
talk about.
Expensive solutions for non-problems are
non-starters. I can take you to the
shop in Soho and pay the specialty
dress designer to cope with the weight
that concentrates around your shoulders
instead of your hips, give you form filling
devices that distract the observer from
the fact that the seams are double-sewn
and your adam's apple dominates your neck,
buy stillettos that push your chest
forward but have extra strength so the
slightly stumbling walk won't send you
on to your bum... but at the end, all
I get is an *ugly girl*.
This isn't about gender, BTW: it is about
false advertising, inflated expectations,
and little surprises that might create nasty
violent situations.
Form. Fit. Function. Do the results
justify the costs for the hazards of
applying the means? Who is asking
these questions at the W3C?
Some public systems already collect and
semantically link data in tremendous quantities.
As these begin to aggregate by a unifying
language, we don't know if the rules we
use in day to day life apply. When they
don't, we are at the edge of chaos. Life
is exciting there. It is also dangerous.
The evolution of the Semantic Web in terms
of its ultimate effects is determined by
those who can afford the metadata. Secondly,
it will be affected by those with the skill
to train the agents and authorize their goals. The
concepts of legitimacy and authority cannot
be reduced simply to trust in very large
pervasive public systems. Nabster and the dot.bomb
to name only two have dramatically shown the results of
"turning the world upside down" and shaking out the change.
Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Al Snell [mailto:alaric@alaric-snell.com]
That's just the marketing hype - don't be afraid. They're just talking
about public distributed systems becoming mainstream, is all. Nothing
really new!