[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Binary XML" proposals
- From: Sean McGrath <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:00:44 +0100
At 13:49 10/04/2001 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>Basically, every binary RPC protocol I've ever seen has been
>converted, sooner or later, into a conduit for proprietary
>platforms. Fragmenting a previously-unified (XML=text)
>world by creating a binary variant seems a fine start, for any
>organizations wanting to head that direction. Large vendors
>can afford the duplicate investments, when they can forsee
>it opens the door to more vendor lock-in.
This is a favourite hobby horse of mine that I wrote about
in SGML for software engineers.
Vendors play on one of the programming communities most
pervasive weakness - fixation on speed of execution at the expense
of speed of change & speed of debugging.
Programmer : "Why is it all hidden behind an API with the data
stored in binary?"
Vendor: "Oh, we have to do that for efficiency reasons"
Programmer: "Oh, ok".
 Out of print. Written in pre-history. (1997)