[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Binary XML" proposals
- From: "Al B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
- To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 02:00:18 +0100 (BST)
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, David Brownell wrote:
> > Hmmm... throwing petrol onto the fire here, how do you guys feel about XML
> > schemas that feature non-XML sublanguages like XPath or the path thingies
> > in SVG?
> I certainly see the trend to "big fat XML" as increasing
> barriers to entry for new vendors, and promoting customer
> lock-in for current vendors. Don't you?
What do you refer to as "big fat XML", exactly? Your meaning isn't clear
to me :-)
(Then again, it is 2am here in the UK...)
ABS
--
Alaric B. Snell
http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software