[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions)
- From: James Strachan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Al B. Snell" <email@example.com>,The Deviants <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:04:17 +0100
From: "Al B. Snell" <email@example.com>
> > I suggest you include a dimension for documents
> > with single namespaces and multiple namespaces as
> > well. Some serious minds think that impacts
> > parser performance as well and is posed as
> > part of the RDF-over-XMLSchemas arguments.
> Really? Ok, I'll put that in too. Thanks!
> (in progress :-)
I've not managed to track the whole text-v-binary discussions - I find it
hard to find the time to keep up with xml-dev these days :-(.
Is your intention to build a performance testing framework to demonstrate
the performance difference of binary v. text XML parsers?
If so, I've been meaning to investigate the relative performances of a
variety of SAX parsers (crimson, Xerces1/2, Aelfred), both with and without
validation along with some other configurations like turning on and off of
String "interning". Plus I'd like to test the performance of a variety of
tree object models too such as DOM (crimson, Xerces 1/2), dom4j, Electric,
It might be a good idea to combine our efforts into the same benchmarking
suite so (say) it would be easy to compare a binary SAX driver fares against
the best text SAX drivers etc.
My idea was to create a SourceForge project for the benchmark suite.
Does this seem of interest or am I way off where you're at?
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com