[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Binary XML" proposals
- From: "Anders W. Tell" <email@example.com>
- To: Amy Lewis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:26:25 +0200
Amy Lewis wrote:
> Why is this a hack? Large amounts of XML contain large amounts of
> text; it's hard to imagine a binary encoding of document-oriented XML
> achieving any real benefits. A sufficiently advanced encoding scheme,
> such as BER for ASN.1, ultimately yields great pain in the programmer
> (apologies to Olivier and the others who enjoy it ... I had to write
> the protocol decodes with fairly hard real-time constraints, and I
> *hated* it). Or XDR for RPC ... I'll have nightmares, I'm sure, with
> the memory returned now.
ASN1 is a good standard but difficult to use and there its is possible to write
much "simpler" parsers ANS 1 ones.
> Why? Why is it nicer to stuff binary into XML (which is specifically
> designed for text transmission), than to create a container meta format
> to transport XML + binary?
Well, in SOAP there are MIME support, which is used as transport for
I Think both approaches are desirable.