[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: "Binary XML" proposals
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:51:39 -0500
The question is not is a binary useful for
any given XML application language, but is a standard
XML binary useful for all of them. WML has one because
it needs one and it is good for WML. Generalizing that
leads to false conclusions because the form and fit is
not the same for the function.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Al B. Snell [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Sean McGrath wrote:
> In my experience, when I run the figures, xml parsing does not
> feature highly in the performance hotspot data of my applications.
What kind of apps are you doing? It sounds like binary XML wouldn't be a
win *for you* :-)
But I expect you're not doing scientific computation or image processing!