[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Binary XML" proposals
- From: Matt Sergeant <matt@sergeant.org>
- To: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 12:06:17 +0100 (BST)
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Steinar Bang wrote:
> >>>>> "Al B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>:
>
> > ...but if you're going to use TCP for RPCs, for God's sake don't use
> > port 80; that's for transferring hypertext. We have 65,000 or so
> > port numbers to choose from. If we use different port numbers for
> > different things, firewall administrators can make networks secure
> > by controlling what does and doesn't get let through.
>
> Ah, but SOAP using port 80 is a _feature_, you know. It allows SOAP
> to _tunnel_ through the firewall.
Some firewall administrators might call that "circumvention" :-)
--
<Matt/>
/|| ** Founder and CTO ** ** http://axkit.com/ **
//|| ** AxKit.com Ltd ** ** XML Application Serving **
// || ** http://axkit.org ** ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP **
// \\| // ** mod_perl news and resources: http://take23.org **
\\//
//\\
// \\