[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery ..)
- From: Murali Mani <mani@CS.UCLA.EDU>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> I think Henry is right similar to the way the Grove guys
> were right.
Where is Henry right?
I say that we almost always end up with non-deterministic content models
during document processing.
I also say that unique particle attribution as in XML Schema is *very*
exaggerated, if we need UPA (i doubt if we need it), we need UPA as
provided by unambiguous regular tree grammars.
regards - murali.