[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xml-bin] :-(
- From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@lig.net>
- To: xml-bin@warhead.org.uk, "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 16:52:17 -0400
"Al B. Snell" wrote:
>
> http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/04/18/binaryXML.html
>
> Didn't really capture our side of the argument, it seems...
Filtering out all opposing arguments as not worth printing seems a bit
unfair. There's a lot of "kill the solution before it matures" going on
here. On the other hand, I have no problem with people asking for
evidence that it's a better method. It's just a hypothesis waiting to
be properly tested. And no, my solution hasn't been tested yet.
No matter, the problem I'm solving isn't a figment of my imagination,
and my solution is rapidly graduating from that realm. It may very well
be too expensive to be worth it in more cases than I hope, but I'm not
afraid to find out.
> ABS
>
> --
> Alaric B. Snell
> http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
> Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software
sdw
--
sdw@lig.net http://sdw.st
Stephen D. Williams
43392 Wayside Cir,Ashburn,VA 20147-4622 703-724-0118W 703-995-0407Fax
Dec2000