[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transitive closure for XPath
- From: Uche Ogbuji <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:17:45 -0600 (MDT)
> > something I really lose sleep over is the lack of a transitive closure
> > function in XPath. [...]
> > Would you please comment on a little proposal I have written -
> > an implementation of the operator for Xalan as a freebie:
> > http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/c.nentwich/closure/
> This is indeed a very useful feature.
> The proposal as described slightly breaks the XPath evaluation
> model though: the second argument to 'closure(node-set,node-set)'
> has Algol-style call-by-name semantics. That is, it's not really
> a node-set but rather an XPath expression or "thunk" which
> is re-evaluated with a different context multiple times.
> I think this calls for new syntax, either a new keyword or operator.
I'm sorry: I haven't looked closely at Christian's proposal, but based on
whay you say above, this might fall in with the dynamic programming
features under discussion for EXSLT (and that were earlier discussed on
Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
email@example.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python