[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Binary XML" proposals
- From: Al Snell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Olivier Dubuisson <Olivier.Dubuisson@francetelecom.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:26:49 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Olivier Dubuisson wrote:
> Thanks so much! The ASN.1 group is currently meeting in Los Angeles to
> progress this work.
> One advantage in using a standardized solution vs. an ad-hoc one is that it
> improves interoperability.
> Information can be found at: http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/xml/
> If there are people interested in these mappings, it would be my pleasure
> to receive their comments (to me directly -- please indicate which mapping
> you're interested in: ASN.1 -> XML or XML -> ASN.1) and associate them to our
> work to make sure that we end up with what people are looking for.
Yes, I'm personally quite keen to see if I can fold my work into this, for
the simple reason that the most important outcome of all this is to define
a *standardised* representation, and something with the backing of a large
body will help.
The standard really ought to get at least recognised by the W3C, though -
I'd need to research the politics involved...
Alaric B. Snell
http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software