[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RDF and URIs (was Re: Modularity, et al.)
- From: Aaron Swartz <email@example.com>
- To: Wayne Steele <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:52:59 -0500
Wayne Steele <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Supplement this with some agreeable algorthims, for instance that
> "http://example.org/doc#foo" is equivalent to
> "http://example.org/doc#xpointer(foo)", and I think a pretty good 80/20
> point for URI identity can be reached.
> But RDF is the problem, because it has a "special" way of looking at URIs.
What is this "special" way? It would be fine for your RDF-based system to
understand XPointer and canonicalize URIs. What's the problem with RDF here?
[ Aaron Swartz | email@example.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]