[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: TREX and RELAX unite?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Michael Champion <email@example.com>,xml-dev <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:04:34 -0500
This comment needs clarification:
"The main problem I have with it is it's too complicated," said James Clark,
an XML expert in Bangkok, Thailand, who launched his own schema effort,
called Trex, in December. "It's fine if you're a huge company like Microsoft
[Corp.] or IBM. They can just add more developers."
Is Clark comparing the developers of schema support tools (eg, schema
authors of schemas? Presuming the former, from the perspective of tool
is this as interesting an issue as the possibility of having several
alternatives? Intertransformability will be the issue. It's ugly but it is
a way to enable choice among technical means.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Michael Champion [mailto:email@example.com]
eWeek has an article about the W3C XML Schema complexity controversy at