[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SV: [Xmlconf-developer] RE: XML Schema Test Collection open for contributions
- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se>
- To: "'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 18:31:41 +0200
Indeed, congratulations. Let's hope that the implementations written to
support Schemas get properly tested to gain widespread acceptance and use.
If you want some ideas about how a process around a test suite could look,
please visit www.w3.org/DOM/Test. Also feel free to joing the mailing list
indicated by Curt.
All ideas/suggestions welcome.
Best of luck
/Dimitris Dimitriadis, W3C DOM WG repr. to the NIST-W3C DOM WG Test Suite
framework
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Arnold, Curt [mailto:Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com]
Skickat: den 2 maj 2001 17:50
Till: 'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'
Kopia: 'www-xml-schema-tests@w3.org';
'xmlconf-developer@lists.sourceforge.net'
Ämne: [Xmlconf-developer] RE: XML Schema Test Collection open for
contributions
Congrats to all on reaching recommendation. Now on to fully
implementing and testing the thing.
www-xml-schema-tests@w3.org didn't seem to have a corresponding
www-xml-schema-tests-request@w3.org or a listing in the public
archives. I don't know if you intend the mailing list to be
a public forum (ala www-dom-ts@w3.org) and the
subscription and archives are lagging the announcement
or if the email address is either W3C member only or a place
to drop tests off in the middle of the night.
Anyone who wants a sandbox to play in is welcome
to participate in xmlconf.sourceforge.net or to
discuss schema testing on the
xmlconf-developer@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlconf-developer
My initial thoughts is that it might be appropriate to have
a distinct representation for simpleType tests. For simpleType's
if you had a test description along the lines of:
<tests>
<simpleType ref="xs:double">
<invalidLexical>
<value>3..141595</value>
<value>ABCDEFGH</value>
</invalidLexical>
<invalidValue>
<value>3.14926E906</value>
</invalidValue>
<!-- each value must be greater than the previous -->
<order>
<value>-INF</value>
<value>-1E300</value>
<value>-0</value>
<value>0</value>
<value>1E-300</value>
<value>1</value>
<value>1E300</value>
<value>INF</value>
<value>NaN</value>
</order>
<equality>
<value>1</value>
<value>1.00</value>
<value>1.00000000000000000000000000001</value>
</equality>
<!-- would probably need a no comparison test for times -->
</simpleType>
</tests>
You could either do unit tests on the simpleType classes or
synthesize a schema and documents that tested all of the
assertions.
_______________________________________________
Xmlconf-developer mailing list
Xmlconf-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlconf-developer
http://xmlconf.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Xmlconf-developer mailing list
Xmlconf-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlconf-developer
http://xmlconf.sourceforge.net