[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ANN] XQuery prototype
- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- To: Michael Dyck <MichaelDyck@home.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:13:49 -0700
They are in the W3C archives. Since there is a new syntax coming out
soon, I would rather not reopen this discussion.
Best regards
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Dyck
Sent: Tue 5/15/2001 8:26 PM
To: Michael Rys
Cc: Jonathan Robie; xml-dev@ic.ac.uk; www-ql@w3c.org;
xmldb@xmldb.org; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] XQuery prototype
Michael Rys wrote:
>
> the February's working drafts normative grammar was - umh -
rather buggy
What bugs did you find? Certainly, the BNF is ambiguous, but the
subsequent
precedence rules take care of most of that. Also, in the Use
Case document,
some of the 'Solutions in XQuery' appear to assume a different
set of
precedence rules, but it's not clear whether the Solutions or
the grammar is
at fault.
-Michael Dyck
winmail.dat