[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
- From: Jeff Lowery <email@example.com>
- To: 'Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI' <firstname.lastname@example.org>,Jeff Lowery <email@example.com>, Eddie Robertsson <firstname.lastname@example.org>,email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:28:36 -0700
Oops, sorry. You're correct. Time for another eye exam...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:18 PM
> To: Jeff Lowery; Eddie Robertsson; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
> > > I understand that you can't believe what I said. But the
> fact is, the
> > > spec explicitly prohibits this. If you have some time and plenty
> > > of patience, see the spec:
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#rcase-Recurse
> > Looking at this, I see rules for model groups, not
> enumeration facets. I
> > don't believe enumerations facets are order-dependent, if
> that's your point.
> > Restriction of enumerations is allowed, and such appears in
> the Schema for
> > Schemas (Normative) section of the Recommendation.
> Maybe I'm missing something big, but when did we talk about
> of simple type by enumerations?
> I think we are talking about restriction of <all> particle.
> E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org