[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
- From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Martin Gudgin <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:17:14 -0700
> Agreed in principle, but something needs to be namespace qualified...
Yeah, and it is true that the logic is not the only reason ... just like
any other human custom.
> More SOAP examples?
No. Non-SOAP examples, if your time permits. Because I found some
familiar names in the SOAP spec and that makes me think of the
possibility of the strong connection between the two specs.
> I just don't see what the big deal is. Markup languages like XSLT and others
> you mention qualify all elements, that's fine. Data serialization may take a
> different approach. I think this is also perfectly OK. I don't think there
> is any 'correct usage' that applies to all scenarios.
I don't understand why you always regard this as "data vs document", as
if there is a clear distinction between them.
By the way, do you admit that it is a pitfall for many novice authors
that elementFormDefault="unqualified" by default?
Do you admit that the default value of elementFormDefault is a