[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
- From: Martin Gudgin <email@example.com>
- To: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 19:29:58 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
> > I just don't see what the big deal is. Markup languages like XSLT and
> > you mention qualify all elements, that's fine. Data serialization may
> > different approach. I think this is also perfectly OK. I don't think
> > is any 'correct usage' that applies to all scenarios.
> I don't understand why you always regard this as "data vs document", as
> if there is a clear distinction between them.
Because, by inspection, markup languages tend to use all qualified elements
whereas data reps tend to not do so.
I don't understand why you think there is only one right way to use
> By the way, do you admit that it is a pitfall for many novice authors
> that elementFormDefault="unqualified" by default?
For the record, I was one of the proponents of keeping
elementFormDefault='unqualified' as the default. You might call it a pitfall
for novice authors, I call it a pedagogical tool ;-) ;-)
> Do you admit that the default value of elementFormDefault is a
> controversial topic?
Doubtless, otherwise we would not be having this conversation...