Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?

[Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsukekawaguchi@yahoo.com>]

> I don't understand why you think there is only one right way to use
> namespaces.

Because I don't see any logical reason in any other way (at least the SOAP's
way). You've failed to rationalize it, haven't you. You once said:

> That part of the spec is
> non-normative, I take it to be saying 'here is *one* way to think about
> namespaces'.

Yes, that might be true. But apparently someone ignores this
interpretation and invented another way. And as far as we know, there is
no logical reason in it!   Then now you are saying that I should treat
your way as an equally valid way to use namespaces.

I don't think your logic is convincing.

But I agree that this is much like a religious talk, or our good old "should
we use goto statement or not?" debate. There is more of belief than
logic.




regards,
----------------------
K.Kawaguchi
E-Mail: kohsukekawaguchi@yahoo.com