[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data model s
- From: Al Snell <email@example.com>
- To: Uche Ogbuji <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 12:54:38 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> OO was about making the operations actually intrinsic to the bundles of
> The post-OO evolution at which I think you hinted is about flipping it
> all the way around so we're drafting neat functions to operate against
> the properly considered data models.
That's a backwards step - databases started with that kind of
architecture, and are trying to move to an OO model (limited somewhat by
the lack of a decent standard)
> maintenance. A trememdous side-effect of XML adoption is that it's
> encouraging developers to finally start putting these matters in the
> right order.
How is this different from the days of SQL databases?
Alaric B. Snell
http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software