[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Off-Topic: RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: "B. Tommie Usdin" <btusdin@mulberrytech.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 11:12:48 -0500
Which not only preserves technical options
(it is useful to tweak an SGML Declaration)
it keeps private consortia from owning
public property. It's a big world but the
choices can be too easily narrowed without
regard to who chooses the choices.
Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: B. Tommie Usdin [mailto:btusdin@mulberrytech.com]
SGML's child, XML, is certainly larger, louder, and more charismatic.
But SGML is not dead.