RE: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm (strayed a bit)

[Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>]

> No need for it.  URIs can be made to nest, and there is no 
> real reason for
> inheritance, since qualifying a name with a namespace doesn't give it
> any particular semantics.

?

No explicit semantics, certainly, but surely the whole point of a namespace
is to imbue its names with with meaning. Unless there's a thousand monkeys
typing well-formed XML schemas somewhere...

> 
> -- 
> John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
> One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
> 	--Douglas Hofstadter
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@lists.xml.org
>