Re: Non-deterministic content model

[Murali Mani <mani@CS.UCLA.EDU>]

Actually Kohsuke is right -- (a & b?) is *not* inherently 1-ambiguous.

Also I think, the language specified by ((a, b)*, a) cannot be written as
an 1-unambiguous regular expression or 1-unambiguous model group -- I
think --

when you see an "a" in the string, you do *not* know whether it is the
first a or the second a, unless you know whether there is b following
it.

i think the above example holds for all model groups defined to date --
thanks a lot.

are there any opinions/suggestions??

Derek, try to give the content model for ((a, b)*, a), if you are not
convinced.

thanks and regards - murali.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, K.Kawaguchi wrote:

>
> > (a, b? | b?, a)
>
> Since the above is the equivalent of ( a | ab | ba ),
> you can write it as
>
> (a,b?) | (b,a)
>
> which is deterministic.
>
> How about this?
>
> > (a b)* a?
>
>
> I think this cannot be written by the deterministic content model.
>
> regards,
> ----------------------
> K.Kawaguchi
> E-Mail: kohsukekawaguchi@yahoo.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@lists.xml.org
>