[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: XSLT vs. document size
- From: Brooks Johnson <bjohnson@qpass.com>
- To: 'KRUMPOLEC Martin' <krumpo@pobox.sk>,"'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:41:15 -0700
Using Sax and a programming language you could split the document into many
smaller documents and pass these smaller document to XSLT from the
programming language. This solution assumes that you can split up your
document into small and easy to digest chunks.
Brooks
-----Original Message-----
From: KRUMPOLEC Martin [mailto:krumpo@pobox.sk]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 12:09 AM
To: 'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'
Subject: XSLT vs. document size
Good morning,
I would like to ask experts (yes you are :-) on this list about the
suitability of the XSLT processing on the bigger documents.
Common size of input files in our scenerio is hundreds of kilobytes,
but in rare peaks it can be tens of megabytes and XSLT processing
sucks too much of memory and CPU ...
What would you suggest ? Can I use XSLT in streaming fashion ?
(I doubt it because of xpath patterns)
Thank you very much
Martin
--
Martin Krumpolec <krumpo@pobox.sk>
------------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
<http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@lists.xml.org