[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SAX 2.0 enhancement proposal
- From: David Brownell <email@example.com>
- To: James Clark <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Rob Lugt <email@example.com>,firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:17:50 -0700
> From: "James Clark" <email@example.com>
> If you change this, you also need to change DTDHandler to pass a baseURI and
> the system ID. This would align better with the infoset
Having spent a bunch of time yesterday looking at the infoset as it
applies specifically to SAX, I think "DTDHandler" changes might
be more justifiable: the XML parser isn't interpreting those URIs,
so the requirement that relative URIs be interpreted according to
that part of the spec (which I won't quote again :) can't apply.
But the infoset (arguably :) provides more support for my position
with respect to parsed entities: in the ONLY case where a parsed
entity's system ID (URI) shows up, it doesn't get the funky treatment
Rob is proposing:
> You need both the base URI and the unabsolutized system ID. I would use a
> hack like ...
Aargh, please no ugly hacks, ever.